CaseSnappy vs ChatGPT: A Comparative Study of AI-Powered Legal Case Summarization

Ayush Sanghavi (Founder & CEO, CaseSnappy)
Sanya Sharma (Growth Assistant, CaseSnappy)

2 June 2025

Download the report
A report titled 'CaseSnappy vs ChatGPT: A Comparative Study of AI-Powered Legal Case Summarization' on a wooden tabletop.

This white paper explores how specialised legal AI tools can transform legal education and prepare students for an AI-integrated profession.

A comparative study with 20 UK law students reveals that CaseSnappy, an AI-powered legal research platform, significantly outperforms ChatGPT in generating high-quality case summaries for legal education. Students preferred CaseSnappy summaries in 77% of direct comparisons across three fundamental legal cases, achieving consistently higher average scores in the specialised context of law.

Students valued CaseSnappy's structured approach, inclusion of direct judicial quotations, and legal-specific optimisations that align with educational requirements. The findings underscore the importance of domain-specific AI optimisation and highlight how specialised applications can transform general AI technology into tools that meet specific professional needs.

Beyond the comparative analysis, this research addresses the broader transformation of legal education in an AI-integrated world. With 92% of students now using AI, educational institutions must embrace guided AI use rather than resist inevitable technological adoption. CaseSnappy's approach of enhancing rather than replacing traditional legal research methods provides a model for responsible AI integration that prepares future lawyers for an AI-enhanced profession whilst maintaining critical thinking skills that define legal excellence.

Get your copy

Thank you for downloading CaseSnappy vs ChatGPT: A Comparative Study of AI-Powered Legal Case Summarization.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.